- Thread starter
- #1
TheBandwagon
Huddler
- Messages
- 590
- Reaction score
- 44
- Points
- 140
True. But no more so than say, ESPN or the NFL Network.But... this is Bleacher Report, so take it with a grain of salt.
Not just the receivers. The CB's and even the Safeties, who I would argue should be #1.
But... this is Bleacher Report, so take it with a grain of salt.
Am I detecting a bit of skepticism in the receiving corps or what?It needs more than just a grain. A chaser and lemon too.
Am I detecting a bit of skepticism in the receiving corps or what?
I kinda took issue with that as well. I like our stable of RBs over just about anyone's but after thinking about it though I can see why they might have been left off the list. You got Lynch and then you got Turbin who a lot of Hawk fans are stoked about (and justifiably so) but he didn't make quite as much of an impact last year as some of the other backups on that list like Bryce Brown or Fred Jackson. So with the Hawks you have Lynch and two relative unknowns outside of Seattle in Turbin and Christine Michael. Still though, Chicago? You gotta be kidding me.No, that was criticism was directed at the Bleacher Report that doesn't mention our RB's.