- Thread starter
- #1
I would be shocked if the guy holds out. He's signed a volunteer workout tender to train with the team even though he's not under contract and technically still a FA. It sounds like he'll play under the tender if a long term deal doesn't get signed this year. I think the Seahawks will ink him to at least 3 years before the season starts. Otherwise he becomes an unrestricted FA next year and that could make resigning him much more difficult.I think Doug is clutch slot guy, and those guys always have a bit of chip on their shoulder.... Hopefully he's not holding out, he is a #3 or 4 guy on this team. I value you him close to what bobby engram was for Hasselhof, but we have Sidney, percy, and kearse. Thats a pretty damn good line up.
Yes, and I think the hawks can match the tender in a multi year deal if he is willing, but if he is looking for 3-4 M a year... No mas...I would be shocked if the guy holds out. He's signed a volunteer workout tender to train with the team even though he's not under contract and technically still a FA. It sounds like he'll play under the tender if a long term deal doesn't get signed this year. I think the Seahawks will ink him to at least 3 years before the season starts. Otherwise he becomes an unrestricted FA next year and that could make resigning him much more difficult.
Yes, and I think the hawks can match the tender in a multi year deal if he is willing, but if he is looking for 3-4 M a year... No mas...
He is a better wide receiver than Tate.NO MAS! that would be as much or more then they offered Tate.
Tate is a play maker and was more explosive but I would take Baldwin over Tate 10/10.