- Thread starter
- #1
Josh007
Huddler
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
Hypothetically,
If Seattle was still AFC West do you think they would have a better or worse chance of winning the division this year?
I know Seattle hasn't been in the AFC in many years but these divisions have a lot of parallels in my eyes. They have both stunk it up the last few years and have been considered the a couple of the worst divisions in football.
But now one team is emerging from each division, San Francisco in the NFC West and Denver in the AFC West, as the clear team to beat.
I personally think the Hawks would have a better chance in the AFC as I do not believe Manning can hold up all season and I think top-to-bottom that the NFC West is stronger overall.
If Seattle was still AFC West do you think they would have a better or worse chance of winning the division this year?
I know Seattle hasn't been in the AFC in many years but these divisions have a lot of parallels in my eyes. They have both stunk it up the last few years and have been considered the a couple of the worst divisions in football.
But now one team is emerging from each division, San Francisco in the NFC West and Denver in the AFC West, as the clear team to beat.
I personally think the Hawks would have a better chance in the AFC as I do not believe Manning can hold up all season and I think top-to-bottom that the NFC West is stronger overall.