Not necessarily sarcasm, but we obviously haven't lost any games after a bye because Carroll is new.bobflipaburger;50931 said:How would that be sarcasm? We really haven't lost any away games after a bye week under carrol.
Not necessarily sarcasm, but we obviously haven't lost any games after a bye because Carroll is new.bobflipaburger;50931 said:How would that be sarcasm? We really haven't lost any away games after a bye week under carrol.
Fenom;50927 said:Are you being sarcastic? lol.
mark;50889 said:i dont think branch was all he was cracked up to be either but housh could catch and i think he was the only reciever we had that was on the same page as hass, sure we got tate but alot remains to be seen. i have seen the front office do some dumb shit things over the years that has come back and bit them in the ass
Bru-Hed;50944 said:Gotta agree. I liked what I saw of Housh. Hopefully the remainders are better. Of course, ALL receivers are moot if Hass can't get the dang ball to them. Wish we had received one of the Patsies' linemen.
It would have been nice, but it seems like a lot of players in New England are good because of the scheme. Remove the scheme, and their average at best (Branch/Cassel).Number 18;51002 said:Woulda been nice if Branch played like that with the Seahawks...
Number 18;51002 said:Woulda been nice if Branch played like that with the Seahawks...
#ONE;51005 said:Yeah... but look at the chemistry developing between Matt and Mike.. those two looked insync the entire game. So many clutch throws and catches.
And that pump fake and floater from Matt and Butler works like a charm every time.
Oh and Bobflipaburger, how about that pass rush on the road??
Bru-Hed;51137 said:Yeah, he suddenly came to life in his first game back. Yet you notice on the SportsCenter wrapup there was not ONE mention of how he did in Seattle--or even Seattle at all for that matter! Friggin' ESPN is not Hawks-friendly from what I've seen.
#ONE;51010 said:Yeah Tom Brady would make Darius Hayward Bay look good