I love how I'm hearing he's a late 3rd early 4th round pick. Why not save the pick for tomorrow?! We wouldn't have had to give up anything. Ruskell pulled the trigger way too quick not a good thing right now.
-
Welcome to Seattle Seahawks NFL Football Forum & Community!
Seahawks Huddle is one of the largest online communities for the Seattle Seahawks. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.
Sign Up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
DRAFT CHAT
- Thread starter bobflipaburger
- Start date
- Thread starter
- Thread Starter
- #102
OP
What are you guys talking about? This is a great pick. The guy can play both guard positions too. Plus he could have gone in the first round.
- Thread starter
- Thread Starter
- #103
OP
I called this one!
It's a good pick, it's just what they gave up to get it.bobflipaburger said:
Hopefully, but all I know is we lost two key picks for this guy. Then again kind of the same deal we did for Lofa, but still not too pleased right now. A lot of other guys were on the board we could have used.
S
Seattlehawk94
Guest
phaZe said:
Exactly...It's WAAAAY too much for a guy who played mostly Center...
Especially when we've got another 1st Rounder at Center and an able backup!
- Thread starter
- Thread Starter
- #107
OP
This dude is a beast.. I'm satisfied. We have the first pick in the 5th round.
True, but we needed a RB, a Tackle, maybe a WR and some Secondary help.bobflipaburger said:
If they move Unger from Center over to RG then it would make sense.
Jones - Whale - Spencer - Unger - Willis
- Thread starter
- Thread Starter
- #109
OP
phaZe said:
Willis? I doubt Willis beats out Locklear. But that's pretty much what I was thinking... This is a dude I really had my eye on.
I kinda like Willis over Locklear, but you're probably right about Locklear starting.bobflipaburger said:
If anyone would do that I'd do it twice
phaZe said:
Maybe the Seahawks will use that 1st Round Pick in 2010 from the Broncos to get a player?
I know they need other positions more than a WR, but maybe that pick and Branch for Boldin?
Sounds like a long shot, but would be cool.
I know they need other positions more than a WR, but maybe that pick and Branch for Boldin?
Sounds like a long shot, but would be cool.
the 17th 2nd round pick for our 3 and 4 was a steal
410 pts for the 2nd vs 250 and 100 for our 3 and 4
410 > 350
410 pts for the 2nd vs 250 and 100 for our 3 and 4
410 > 350
When you look at it that way it seems good, but now we have to wait until the 5th to get our next player.SeahawkWag said:
Considering the player we got with that second round pick, I am happy with the trade. I couldn't be happier with draft day 
phaZe said:
Seahawks trade up to take DT Max Unger
Bears receive:
» 2009 third-round pick (No. 68)
» 2009 fourth-round pick (No. 105)
Seahawks receive:
» 2009 second-round pick (No. 49): Max Unger
DT?????????
- Messages
- 261
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Good draft day. I'm really happy! I cannot believe that Curry was there at 4 and that the Bronco's were stupid enough to give up their (probably top five) pick next season for our second rounder! Max Unger is a good player also. Can never have too much depth on the line. Ruskell really shocked me today. I think he did quite well.
Sorry I wasn't live but the wife insists on certain benefits to marriage, so I TiVo'd it and fast-forwarded thru all the b.s.
My thoughts: stunned that KC passed on Curry. Lambs too. They will both regret it.
Ruskell could not believe his luck that Curry fell to us, and spent the 10 minutes laughing hysterically at what the other teams offered.
Raiders reached. Huge. And if you were surprised by that, you don't know football or the draft. Not as bad as when they picked Janikowski, but still.
I was stunned by all the CB and C taken early 1st round. We got ripped for taking Spencer late 1st round. I think you can get quality CB late.
Our trade in 2nd round with broncos was a coup.
Getting Unger 13 spots later for our 3rd and 4th also huge. We had more picks than needs.
A+ first day.
A+ next day will see us moving up again for RB or a stud D-linemen. Add a CB and we're good.
My thoughts: stunned that KC passed on Curry. Lambs too. They will both regret it.
Ruskell could not believe his luck that Curry fell to us, and spent the 10 minutes laughing hysterically at what the other teams offered.
Raiders reached. Huge. And if you were surprised by that, you don't know football or the draft. Not as bad as when they picked Janikowski, but still.
I was stunned by all the CB and C taken early 1st round. We got ripped for taking Spencer late 1st round. I think you can get quality CB late.
Our trade in 2nd round with broncos was a coup.
Getting Unger 13 spots later for our 3rd and 4th also huge. We had more picks than needs.
A+ first day.
A+ next day will see us moving up again for RB or a stud D-linemen. Add a CB and we're good.
I'd say an A overall.LAhawkFAN said:
I agree that we need to move up and get a RB or a CB or something earlier than the 5th round.
We definitely need to keep that 1st round pick next year so we can get a QB and whatever else we end up needing. I think next year will be the year we take a QB on the 1st day of the draft.
- Thread starter
- Thread Starter
- #120
OP
I'd love to have a draft like the Browns or Patriots had today and trade down a couple times if there's no one we want available.
Similar threads
