- Thread starter
- #1
According to Danny O'Neil, Charlie Whitehurst will start this Sunday against the Giants. Thoughts?
I guess the concussion is worse than they thought. Or, they just don't want him to get another one against the Giants.robdog;51463 said:Dam, what is going on with Hasselbeck?
I don't know why, but I'm kind of excited to see what Whitehurst can do.bobflipaburger;51462 said:I don't really want to go to the game this weekend now.
I'm sure that played into their decision. Maybe not a lot, but it had to a little bit.RockOutWithYourHawkOut;51467 said:This is the right move.. Gives the Seahawks a chance to finally see what Whitehurst is capable of. Lets be honest, the chances of the Seahawks coming out with a win this weekend is pretty slim.. Why risk further injury on Hasselbeck, against one of the best defensive lines in the game. Let him rest up for a pivotal game the following week against the Cardinals on the road.
#ONE;51475 said:Won't matter who is under center... no line, no offense.
Bru-Hed;51476 said:Exactly. I want to see how Whitehurst does (why not?) but we could have Montana, Elway and 1999 Favre under center and not ONE would score a single TD if he's on his back.
:help:
Wouldn't the G-men prepare for a running attack first and then go after the new QB? Force him to throw to beat them as was said previously.
Still wish I could watch it.
You are exactly right. The Giants are gonna send everything they have at us. Our line is really beat up. We got back Pitts which is huge, but lost Hamilton and Okung is out (from what i have read, not sure if its official). If we can get Okung healthy and slide Pitts to guard in place of Hamilton then our line will be fine. This week however i im not very confident that our line will get it done. Like i said, they are gonna send everything they have at us considering our beat up line, and backup qb who has never started a regualr season nfl game. Sure Lynch and Forsett might see a more heavy workload, but it wont matter if they are able to stack the box...it will be continuous 3 and outs if that is the case. Lets just hope Petey and Bates have a good gameplan this week and Whitey is ready for A LOT of pressure. I for one am excited to finally see what Whitey can do, although this is not the ideal scenario.Bru-Hed;51476 said:Exactly. I want to see how Whitehurst does (why not?) but we could have Montana, Elway and 1999 Favre under center and not ONE would score a single TD if he's on his back.
:help:
Wouldn't the G-men prepare for a running attack first and then go after the new QB? Force him to throw to beat them as was said previously.
Still wish I could watch it.
The preseason really isn't a great way to evaluate how a player will do in the regular season. Some guys have outstanding preseasons and end up having horrible regular seasons. Other guys have horrible preseasons and have great regular seasons. I'm not saying Whitehurst will have a great game, but it's too early to say he's going to suck.#ONE;51484 said:The Giants don't have to game plan for anything.... this will be like playing a retard in madden with your difficulty setting to Rookie.
They will stack the box on running plays and stuff our backs before they even get the ball. They will rush 3 or 4 on pass downs and get pressure.
This line needs to be completely rewamped next year... minus Okung and maybe Unger, I wan't every last one of these bums gone by the start of next year.
Until this team does that I will have NO FAITH in them. I don't care who starts at QB.
And since this topic is about Whitehurtst starting. I think he would do horribly regardless of the line situation. He forces throw, looks uncomfortable in the pocket, overthrows open widereceivers resulting in picks.
And from what I saw in preseason anytime he plays from behind, he plays even worse. He cannot run a hurry up offense and will not be able to rally a team even if they're down by one score.
I give him a nice rating of FAIL!!!