- Thread starter
- #1
LaceyBALL3R360
Huddler
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/28077/are-we-sure-on-tarvaris-jackson-to-seattle
on one hand he porbbly would be decently cheap, and him and Bevell do have history...But on the othe hand it is Tavaris Jackson lol, hes unproven hasnt really played much and the time he has seen hasnt looked very good.
But i think maybe just maybe if for some reason we did get him if we used him on alot of rollouts with his speed and strong short arm i think it could possibly help our receiving core, because i feel the wideouts we have would be good on short crossing patterns and slants and digs no more of that pump fake hitch n go BS...and running back routes out of the back field could work.
Thats the only way i think he could even have a chance of being succesful.but thats a very low IF.
on one hand he porbbly would be decently cheap, and him and Bevell do have history...But on the othe hand it is Tavaris Jackson lol, hes unproven hasnt really played much and the time he has seen hasnt looked very good.
But i think maybe just maybe if for some reason we did get him if we used him on alot of rollouts with his speed and strong short arm i think it could possibly help our receiving core, because i feel the wideouts we have would be good on short crossing patterns and slants and digs no more of that pump fake hitch n go BS...and running back routes out of the back field could work.
Thats the only way i think he could even have a chance of being succesful.but thats a very low IF.