Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.
Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
I just don't see how you can think production will be the same. You are saying that a Manningham coming off a torn ACL and PCL will be better than a healthy one through most of the season. Doesn't add up to me.
He actually is better from within the pocket.
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/88192/page/superdome2013/a-couple-qb-stats-to-keep-in-pocket-or-out
I'd grade it out:
Arm Strength: Kaepernick
Mobility: Tie at best, leaning towards Wilson. Kaepernick was sacked half as many times as Wilson while playing less than half a season, but with a superior offensive line. As said here, his straight line speed is probably better, but I think...
In your opinion, sure. But not necessarily in theirs. Red Bryant is unique to what they want to do as well. ET is like an Polamalu or a Reed. You don't pass on him regardless of how you value the position group.
Come on man. Fess up. Earl's draft position is no real indication how they value...
Except that Chancellor played corner and then safety in college.
And just like assuming they value safeties higher than corners, you are assuming they didn't value him just because he sat. Those two things aren't linked. It's more likely he sat because he wasn't showing what he needed to in...
But if they knew no one coveted large CBs like they did, why would they spend a high pick on said CB. The more likely scenario is that they evaluate safeties like everyone else does.
I gotta go with #ONE on this. Draft position has no indication on how they value position groups. They got Sherman in the 5th because others didn't value him as a good corner. Not because they value the position group less.