- Thread starter
- #1
http://prod.www.seahawks.clubs.nfl.c...2-fc117a589e9f
Just putting it out here for all to see in case no one has.
Seems even ET knows one of our weakness's is the slot db.
I"m not saying I"m for this or not, but it does bring up some intriguing thoughts.
For one. Having ET, Sherman and Browner covering would shut down just about any passing game.
Put in Jerome Johnson at the FS to cover the backfield.. would be tempting.
This also puts ET close to the line of scrimmage allowing him to make plays such as The Pitts guy with the hair and the packers safety Woodson.
Like I said, its just a thought to contemplate upon, I know a lot of people won't want to take a allpro safety out, but I think he could do the job better than who we have and with that type of coverage, JJ doesn't have to do the hard stuff like ET had to do in the backfield.
Of course, this would only be in Nickle situations.
Just putting it out here for all to see in case no one has.
Seems even ET knows one of our weakness's is the slot db.
I"m not saying I"m for this or not, but it does bring up some intriguing thoughts.
For one. Having ET, Sherman and Browner covering would shut down just about any passing game.
Put in Jerome Johnson at the FS to cover the backfield.. would be tempting.
This also puts ET close to the line of scrimmage allowing him to make plays such as The Pitts guy with the hair and the packers safety Woodson.
Like I said, its just a thought to contemplate upon, I know a lot of people won't want to take a allpro safety out, but I think he could do the job better than who we have and with that type of coverage, JJ doesn't have to do the hard stuff like ET had to do in the backfield.
Of course, this would only be in Nickle situations.