Oh please share with us your vast and infinite knowledge of NFL QBs , mainly the part about how we should see what a good QB looks like
-
Welcome to Seattle Seahawks NFL Football Forum & Community!
Seahawks Huddle is one of the largest online communities for the Seattle Seahawks. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.
Sign Up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
NFL RECORD
- Thread starter Cmoney
- Start date
Better yet Einstein, why don't tell us why RW is such an effin stud qb. lol Is it his 3rd down efficiency,how great he is at seeing the entire field,his uncanny ability to read the defenses.lmao Watch games you reject,there are other teams that play besides seattle. Then you might,i stress might,because you seem very dense,see how average RW is. 21 qb's would be taken by most before RW.
- Should the Seahawks stick with Russell Wilson?
- Matt Flynn should have been the starter to begin with. (33%, 1,906 Votes)
- No! It's time to bring in Flynn and see what he can do. (27%, 1,573 Votes)
- Yes, but if he underperforms one more time, the Seahawks should rethink that strategy. (16%, 922 Votes)
- Yes! Wilson is the better quarterback and should continue to get the nod. (16%, 904 Votes)
- No, though I'm not entirely sold on Flynn. I'm nervous about the Seahawks now. (5%, 316 Votes)
- I don't know. Neither of them is particularly great. (3%, 149 Votes)
I just farted
And then ?
Oh boy grand pa are we really that dern dumb ?
Is this the best you got
SeaHawksHuddle
Huddler
Jesus. Call a guy out for being a mute and he goes ballistic.
At least he posted something.
I hope he keeps posting.
At least he posted something.
I hope he keeps posting.
Hey man, don't fucking drag me into this. I'm not slurping the Russell teet like Ida and his Idaho lynch mob.
In his defense, he hadn't done anything wrong. He "disagreed" with a few posts and you called him out. Id say he stepped up to the podium.
SeaHawksHuddle
Huddler
Yeah. I think the bullshit "agree" or "disagree" thing was the worst feature implemented on this board. It lets people like ballzdeep hide in the shadows without manning up to an opinion. At least now he is talking, not that he has really proven he can do anything but call names.
lol... I'm not. I was too general in what i said in reply's . I was just talking to the ones that wanted to name call and and act like people are stupid because they don't agree.
SeaHawksHuddle
Huddler
No one's asking everyone to agree on everything. But when the entire planet gets that the run game and the defense lost the game and you have a guy trying to pin it on a quarterback that had a 125.9 passer rating and league leading 90.7 QBR, he is going to take a bit of flack.
I'll agree to an extent. It does come in handy on occasion. Usually if I agree/like a comment and don't have much to add to it, ill click just that. I don't really use the "disagree" feature much. If I don't agree with something, ill usually voice it.
But hey, if you don't like it, just get rid of the whole thing. You've got the power to do so.
SeaHawksHuddle
Huddler
I know you're never short on opinions, lol. And I agree with you. The like/agree is fine, but if you disagree, speak up. Sorry if you can't handle a little heat from others.
18, see what I did ^ there? I agreed with your post. Don't have much to add to it ; )
Fair enough.
In all seriousness. It's no mystery I'm not the biggest Wilsonfan on this forum, but lately, he hasn't been the issue. He's definitely exceeded my expectation, low as they may be.
He was not the problem in Miami. It was play calling, on both sides of the ball. No run-blocking by oline, poor execution and break downs by the defense and that awful penalty that negated Wagners pick-that would've been game.
Anyways, lets put this whole Wilson debate to bed (for now), its a moot point and focus on the real issue: How does a defense give up more yards to Ryan Tannehill in the 4th quarter last week than they did to Aaron Rodgers in an entire game? How does a team that didn't allow an offensive TD in over 130 minutes give up 24 points to Miami in one game? Those are the pressing issues right now, not Wilson.
He was not the problem in Miami. It was play calling, on both sides of the ball. No run-blocking by oline, poor execution and break downs by the defense and that awful penalty that negated Wagners pick-that would've been game.
Anyways, lets put this whole Wilson debate to bed (for now), its a moot point and focus on the real issue: How does a defense give up more yards to Ryan Tannehill in the 4th quarter last week than they did to Aaron Rodgers in an entire game? How does a team that didn't allow an offensive TD in over 130 minutes give up 24 points to Miami in one game? Those are the pressing issues right now, not Wilson.
Similar threads
