• Welcome to Seattle Seahawks NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Seahawks Huddle is one of the largest online communities for the Seattle Seahawks. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Seattle Seahawks to Follow an Old Pattern to Land Their New Quarterback?

  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #21
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
Sign Flynn, he's a FA so it costs us no picks. Trade our 1st, 2nd and 3rd for a top 5 and grab Barkley. I think with the last two drafts and FA Pete and John have put us in position to burn a few picks for that elite QB.

Having both Flynn, Barkley and TJack wouldnt be a bad QB core.


Now that would be great!! I'd hate to trade all three, maybe 1 and 3 . But i don't think pete is going to do it, he's going to die with tj.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #22
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
20110729_tarvaris_jackson_1042e.jpg

Tarvaris says: Lookey here...I'm not only worse than mcnabb,I be havin an IQ of firfteen(13)
 
Messages
5,743
Reaction score
205
Points
320
Location
Roy ,WA
You can't compare Matt learning two new systems in two years (three if you count this year) with much less talent around him to T-Jack who is in the same system he's been in his entire career with a good receiver that he's familiar with (Rice), plus Baldwin, Zach Miller, etc.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #25
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
You can't compare Matt learning two new systems in two years (three if you count this year) with much less talent around him to T-Jack who is in the same system he's been in his entire career with a good receiver that he's familiar with (Rice), plus Baldwin, Zach Miller, etc.


I'm looking at their careers personally. Your absolutely right here! Hass even played about 3 years with recievers that couldn't catch a cold. Most drops in the nfl those years. Seattle is no where on that list even this year.
 

Seahawk28

Huddler
Messages
138
Reaction score
16
Points
90
Location
Oregon City
IF we could trade that far in to pick up Barkley with our #1, and maybe a 3 thrown in, it would be worth it. At the rate we're going we stand to finish better than .500, so our #1 isn't anything to write home about. I'm all for doing what it takes (Draft pick trade wise) to get this guy. Luck would be good too, but money is on Barkley. Either way, we have a QB for the future, with a very talanted young team around him. Yeah, there are other positions to be addressed, but this is the big one, future wise.
 

szat

Huddler
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
192
Points
240
Location
Portland
Hassellbeck would have been retired if he would have hawks this season, early when our line was completely green.
Now your starting to see the pendelim swing. Watching Matt right now, against the Bills, he looks really good.
But last year he played like shit (until the playoffs). If you inserted Matt into our offense now, he might play well maybe even better than TJack, but you cant deny that Tjack has improved, had rating against Philly was 139. Its not as black and white as you make it seem.
 
Messages
5,743
Reaction score
205
Points
320
Location
Roy ,WA
Our line was shit last year too. It is pretty black and white to me. Matt wasn't great last year but with tthe running game (that he had maybe twice all of last season) and the playmakers we've added to this offense I believe Matt could have a pro bowl caliber season. Matt knows how to throw receivers open, he knows how to get the ball Mike Williams. Jackson hasn't proved he can do any of that, he's surppassed my expectations, but let's not go overboard here, here's not going to the pro bowl anytime soon.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #29
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
Our line was shit last year too. It is pretty black and white to me. Matt wasn't great last year but with tthe running game (that he had maybe twice all of last season) and the playmakers we've added to this offense I believe Matt could have a pro bowl caliber season. Matt knows how to throw receivers open, he knows how to get the ball Mike Williams. Jackson hasn't proved he can do any of that, he's surppassed my expectations, but let's not go overboard here, here's not going to the pro bowl anytime soon.

Yeah, pretty black and white to me also. It is humorous to see the argument,it just makes no sense at all.T-suck has improved alright, he went very,very,shitty,to very shitty! wow,what a qb!! I'll take T-choke as a backup if i'm forced to,but as starter,on the team i like,no thanks.
 

HawksFan1987

Banned
Banned
Messages
169
Reaction score
7
Points
90
Location
Vancouver, WA
Screw it..lets trade our entire draft for TEBOW!

1st, 2nd and 3rd?! Are you guys fucking high?

Schneider and Carroll will never do this. They're bargain shoppers and damn good ones at that.

Flynn's as good as ours.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #31
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
They wouldn't trade tebow. Yeah, who the hell would want tebow.... i mean shit, who in the sam hell wants to win. A qb that wins... no way.Keep him! TJ,TJ,TJ,TJ,TJ.. LOL So what's tebows winning percentage? lol who's high?
 
Messages
5,743
Reaction score
205
Points
320
Location
Roy ,WA
If we're going to cripple ourselves to trade up for a QB, we might as well as try to get the Colts' pick and draft Luck.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #33
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
If we're going to cripple ourselves to trade up for a QB, we might as well as try to get the Colts' pick and draft Luck.

They aren't going to trade up... i don't think anyway. They are homers, they will get flynn,a guy that has been in the league 4 years and still looks like a rookie. But, i'd rather have him than what we have now.
 

szat

Huddler
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
192
Points
240
Location
Portland
Our line was shit last year too. It is pretty black and white to me. Matt wasn't great last year but with tthe running game (that he had maybe twice all of last season) and the playmakers we've added to this offense I believe Matt could have a pro bowl caliber season. Matt knows how to throw receivers open, he knows how to get the ball Mike Williams. Jackson hasn't proved he can do any of that, he's surppassed my expectations, but let's not go overboard here, here's not going to the pro bowl anytime soon.

Ya our line sucked last year and the begining of this year. I wouldnt disagree that matt might be playing better right now, but we made the right move bringing in T jack a tougher qb to save matt from certian death weve been over this ground many times before........

What is very clear is that ballzdeep has utter hate for Tjack, and mancrush for VY (texas love) and MH.
Which is fine Im glad the ppl who get paid to make the decisions dont feel the same way...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #35
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
Ya our line sucked last year and the begining of this year. I wouldnt disagree that matt might be playing better right now, but we made the right move bringing in T jack a tougher qb to save matt from certian death weve been over this ground many times before........

What is very clear is that ballzdeep has utter hate for Tjack, and mancrush for VY (texas love) and MH.
Which is fine Im glad the ppl who get paid to make the decisions dont feel the same way...


No, no,no... i don't like either one of them!!! They both are not good at all. I'm saying vince is better,and he is. His entire career says so.Because you don't like it,you come up with stupid statements like that? wtf I'm sorry if you have a hard on for T-suck,that's your problem. You are right though on only one thing, i hate T-shit. Using your retarded logic, that means you want to have but sex with your local players? If no, then don't post stupid shit that i didn't say.
 

JustDoug

Huddler
Messages
258
Reaction score
20
Points
60
At Ballzdeep,

2011 Tarvaris Jackson: Averaging about 190 yrds per game, with four more to go.
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
2,255 7.0 3.1 3.7 31 76.1

2010 Mathew Hasselbeck:
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
3,001 6.8 2.7 3.8 29 73.2

2009 Mathew Hasselbeck:
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
3,029 6.2 3.5 3.5 32 75.1

2008 Mathew Hasselbeck:
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
1,216 5.8 2.4 4.8 19 57.8

My assessment seems more accurate; as neither quarterback had an offensive line to speak of. Neither had a stretch the field receiver, neither had a consistant running game, and neither had a consistant coaching philosphy. Still though, Tarvaris came in not knowing any of his team mates, which is a little harder to do. Can we get an offensive line next?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #37
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
At Ballzdeep,

2011 Tarvaris Jackson: Averaging about 190 yrds per game, with four more to go.
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
2,255 7.0 3.1 3.7 31 76.1

2010 Mathew Hasselbeck:
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
3,001 6.8 2.7 3.8 29 73.2

2009 Mathew Hasselbeck:
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
3,029 6.2 3.5 3.5 32 75.1

2008 Mathew Hasselbeck:
Yards Yrds/Att TD% Int% Sck'd Rate
1,216 5.8 2.4 4.8 19 57.8

My assessment seems more accurate; as neither quarterback had an offensive line to speak of. Neither had a stretch the field receiver, neither had a consistant running game, and neither had a consistant coaching philosphy. Still though, Tarvaris came in not knowing any of his team mates, which is a little harder to do. Can we get an offensive line next?


whatever man.... If you like t-suck over hass that's completely your prerogative! Hass has PROVEN to be a better player than t-joke will ever be. Career stats is where you need to look! Winning percentage is a good stat also, shows if they lift their teams up or not.
 

JustDoug

Huddler
Messages
258
Reaction score
20
Points
60
At Ballz again,
I admire your integrity sticking up for Hass and all. In the end, it ain't up to either of us cusses!
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #39
OP
Ballzdeep

Ballzdeep

Huddler
Messages
90
Reaction score
7
Points
80
Location
Dallas
At Ballz again,
I admire your integrity sticking up for Hass and all. In the end, it ain't up to either of us cusses!


true.... Just can't wait to get a qb,and we are talking about whether this team will win 12 or 13 games!
 

HawksFan1987

Banned
Banned
Messages
169
Reaction score
7
Points
90
Location
Vancouver, WA
They wouldn't trade tebow. Yeah, who the hell would want tebow.... i mean shit, who in the sam hell wants to win. A qb that wins... no way.Keep him! TJ,TJ,TJ,TJ,TJ.. LOL So what's tebows winning percentage? lol who's high?

Ok dude, now youre just being a contrarian.
 
Top Bottom